Introduction
The specific work plans identified in this section represent an integrated approach to ensure the accomplishment and effectiveness of all the grant activities. Each work plan plays an important role in achieving all the priorities and the specific measurable changes.
The lead staff for all aspects of the Achieving the Dream initiative are the Executive Director of Strategic Initiatives and Institutional Research and the Learning Support Network Director,
First Year Experience Learning Communities – Work Plan 1
Priority Areas: A, B, C.
Evidence/Rational: The research presented in the literature summarized in the ongoing Learning
Communities Demonstration Project, from the National Center for Postsecondary Research,
suggests that participating in a learning community and having cohort membership is related to a
more positive college experience, stronger connections among students and with the college
community and increased interaction around academic activity, along with gains in student
persistence. Included in these findings is discussion of student development of “peer
responsibility” and the view of other cohort members “as motivators for maintaining good study
habits and pursuing academic goals.”
Measurable Changes after Two Years: Increase the completion rates of developmental math and English by 5-8 percentage points; increase the completion rate in Math 098 by 5-8 percentage points; increase the completion rate in English 101 by 5-8 percentage points; increase the enrollment rate in English 102 by 5-8 percentage points; and increase the completion rate in English 102 by 5-8 percentage points.
Measurable Changes after Four Years: Increase the number of student re-enrolling from fall to fall by 8-10 percentage points; increase the completion rate of developmental math and English by 10-16 percentage points; increase the completion rates of Math 098, English 101 and English 102 by 10-16 percentage points; and increase the enrollment rate of English 102 by 10-16 percentage points.
The above “Measurable Changes after Two Years” and “Measurable Changes after Four Years” will be the same for all Work Plans.
| Work Plan | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Key Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Year Experience Learning Communities– Learning communities designed to facilitate student success and retention with content emphasizing but not limited to developmental mathematics, English 101, English 102 and student development. |
|||||
| 1A. Development of First Year Experience English and Developmental Mathematics Learning Communities 1B. Develop and pilot learning communities that will support learning in other designated areas of need. |
|
X | X | X | Vice President of Instruction, Deans of Math and Science and the Humanities and Social Sciences, Math and English faculty, Counselors, additional faculty as needed |
| 2. Pilot First Year Experience Learning Communities | X | X | X | ||
| 3. Evaluate efficacy of various learning community models. Limit, revise, expand or institutionalize learning community models as indicated. | X | X | X | ||
Developmental Mathematics Cohort – Work Plan II
Priority Areas: A, B, C.
Evidence/Rational: See Evidence/Rational for Work Plan 1
Measurable Changes after Two Years: See Work Plan 1
Measurable Changes after Four Years: See Work Plan 1
| Work Plan | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Key Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Math 084/Math 085/Math 098 Developmental Mathematics Cohort- Yearlong developmental cohort to promote persistence and student success through the developmental algebra sequence | |||||
| 1. Develop curriculum, participatory structures, student support, intentional student development and student intake into the structured developmental cohort | X | X | LSN Director, Math Faculty, Student Support Services | ||
| 2. Run two developmental cohorts with differing participation structures | X | Math Faculty | |||
| 3. Evaluate efficacy of the developmental mathematics cohorts and participation structures. Revise and/or expand as indicated | X | X | X | Institutional Research, Data team, math faculty | |
Learning Support Network– Work Plan III
Priority Areas: A, B, C.
Evidence/Rational: The creation of the LSN will enable the college to study the efficacy of tactics
currently employed as well as facilitate the implementation of new ones. Conceptually,
envisioning the student as a totality is essential. Instead of continuing the current practice of
providing isolated, uncontextualized assistance, a range of coordinated services will be offered to
promote the idea of the learner as an integrated being. The LSN approach is similar to the
Teaching and Learning Center practice used at other AtD community colleges with successful
results.
Measurable Changes after Two Years: See Work Plan 1
Measurable Changes after Four Years: See Work Plan 1
| Learning Support Network | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Lead Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Take inventory and determine current student use and any unmet gaps in academic learning support offerings and related services | X | X | Core team, Data team, LSN Director, academic learning support managers and coordinators | ||
| 2. Research options and evaluate models including physical space allocations and virtual systems | X | X | Core team, Data team, LSN Director, academic learning support managers and coordinators | ||
| 3. Based on findings in (2.), plan, develop, pilot and evaluate appropriate learning support interventions. | X | X | X | Executive Director of Strategic Initiatives and Institutional Research, Core team, Data team, LSN Director, academic learning support managers and coordinators | |
| 4. A Learning Support Network website devoted to organizing student support services will be developed, piloted and evaluated. | Design and planning stage | X | X | X | LSN Director, academic learning support managers, faculty, Core team, IT services |
| 5. Institutionalize opportunities for cross campus dialog to inform, structure and coordinate successful student experiences and support structures. | X | X | X | LSN Director, Core team |
Evidence/Rational: An Early Warning System facilitates student retention by identifying at risk students early in the quarter and providing the appropriate support services needed for those students to successfully complete their academic term.
| Work Plan | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Lead Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Warning System - A system to identify and support students at risk of unsuccessfully completing their coursework | |||||
| 1. Develop structure, participants and target courses for Fall 2008 Early Warning System pilot. | X | LSN Director, Counselors, Math and English faculty, Tutoring Coordinators, IT services | |||
| 2. Develop and implement designated Early Warning System Academic tutor program for developmental math, developmental English and English 101 and 102. | X | X | LSN Director, Counselors, Math and English faculty, IT services | ||
| 3. Pilot Early Warning System | X | LSN Director, Counselors, Math and English faculty, IT services | |||
| 4. Evaluate efficacy and design of Early Warning System. Modify design and/or expand Early Warning System as indicated. | X | X | X | LSN Director, Counselors, Math and English faculty, IT services, Institutional Research, Data team | |
Evidence/Rational: Students in focus groups consistently reported that tutoring is one of the key areas that has helped them succeed in classes. Currently, the college has two tutoring labs, one for math and science students and one open to all students (College-wide tutoring). The first step in providing high quality tutoring services is researching and evaluating the effectiveness of our current tutoring offerings. To more effectively serve our diverse student population, Seattle Centrals tutoring should be informed by current tutoring best practices including alternative tutoring models where warranted.
| Tutoring and Academic Support Services | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Lead Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Install Accutrack in Math lab and College-wide tutoring to track and evaluate student use. | X | IT services, tutoring lab coordinators, Institutional Research, Data team, | |||
| 2. Research and determine tutoring best practices along with alternate tutoring models, including online tutoring to provide high quality tutoring services. | X | X | X | X | Tutoring coordinators, LSN Director, IT services |
| 3. Determine tutoring models and services that will best scaffold developmental mathematics, English and our gate keeper courses. | X | X | X | Tutoring coordinators, Math and English faculty, LSN Director | |
| 4. Develop a plan for improving tutoring services based on the findings from (1.), (2.) and (3.). | X | X | X | Tutoring coordinators, Faculty, LSN Director | |
| 5. Conduct ongoing tracking and evaluation of tutoring use, services and models. | X | X | X | Institutional Research, Data team |
Evidence/Rational: At present, the college provides limited supplemental instruction to students. However, research results from other Achieving the Dream colleges, such as Valencia Community College, have shown that supplemental instruction has helped student progression in completing remediation courses and degree completion. In the Valencia Community College AtD study, under-prepared black students, one of Seattle Centrals target populations, benefited the most from supplemental instruction and had the highest progression rate among the ethnic groups.
| Supplemental Instruction – Mathematics | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Lead Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Evaluate use and efficacy of current supplemental instruction mathematics offerings. Evaluate intake pathways to increase the number of students in the target population participating in the current initiatives. | X | X | X | X | Institutional Research, Student Services, Mathematics Faculty, Data team |
| 2. Research mathematics supplemental instruction best practices and critical junctures or content hurdles in the mathematics curriculum that would benefit from supplemental instruction. After content needs have been determined develop, pilot and evaluate additional supplemental instruction support structures. | X | X | X | X | Mathematics faculty, LSN Director |
| 3. Create online developmental mathematics full course review modules. Conduct ongoing evaluation of student use of review materials. Modify content or organization of the modules where warranted. | X | X | X | X | Mathematics faculty, Math Lab coordinators, LSN Director |
| 4. Develop topic review module materials and determine the best distribution mechanism for these modules. Conduct ongoing evaluation of student use of review materials. Modify content and/or distribution pathways where warranted. | X | X | X | Mathematics faculty, Math Lab coordinators, LSN Director |
Evidence/Rational: See Evidence/Rational for supplemental math instruction
| Supplemental Instruction – English | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Lead Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Investigate specific English skills and/or intake mechanism that will scaffold student success through English 101 and 102 with special attention paid to scaffolding our target population. | X | X | X | English faculty | |
| 2. Develop, pilot and determine efficacy of supplemental English instruction models. | X | X | X | English faculty, Institutional Research, Data team | |
| 3. Develop topic review module materials and determine the best distribution mechanism for these modules. Conduct ongoing evaluation of student use of review materials. Modify content and/or distribution pathways where warranted. | X | X | X | English faculty, College-wide tutoring coordinator, LSN Director, Institutional Research, Data team |
Faculty Professional Development – Work Plan IV
Priority Area: For all three priorities, A, B, C
Evidence/Rationale: Faculty and professional development is a critical component in facilitating student success, especially students who are under-prepared for college education. Faculty development assuring that new and revised course design incorporates the best available approaches to student learning, along with making certain that course offerings and outcomes are fully aligned, is crucial to student success. In addition, comprehensive faculty and professional development is a critical component in launching and managing new initiatives for enhancing student success.
Measurable Changes after Two Years: See Work Plan 1.
Measurable Changes after Four Years: See Work Plan 1.
| Faculty Professional Development | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Lead Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Develop comprehensive faculty professional development that supports faculty engagement in the Achieving the Dream interventions. | X | X | X | X | Core team, Deans of Math and Science and Humanities and Social Sciences, Math and English faculty, LSN Director |
| 2. Develop a faculty professional development plan in teaching and learning with annual training schedules. Special emphasis will be placed on teaching developmental math and gate keeper courses including English 101 and 102. | X | X | X | Core team, Deans of Math and Science and Humanities and Social Sciences, Math and English faculty, LSN Director | |
| 3. Provide faculty training workshops that support the teaching of our target population, including faculty education and development on student diversity as it relates to academic success and on study habits, learning styles including fostering academic success, retention and persistence of our target population. | X | X | X | Core team, LSN Director | |
| 4. Conduct follow-up faculty surveys and evaluate workshop offerings | X | X | X | Institutional Research, Data team |
Faculty Professional Development – Work Plan V
Priority Area: For all three priorities, A, B, C
Evidence/Rational: Engagement with the greater community is essential for assuring that the institutional transformation Seattle Central is undertaking through our Achieving the Dream initiative has the best chance of widespread buy-in, recognition, participation and success. Establishing practices that foster effective, ongoing dialog with representatives from the communities whose students face the most significant barriers to success, as well as with other college constituencies, and that include regular production and dissemination of information about the initiative, are of critical importance.
Measurable Changes after Two Years: See Work Plan 1.
Measurable Changes after Four Years: See Work Plan 1.
| Faculty Professional Development | Spring-Summer 2008 | Year Two | Year Three | Year Four | Lead Staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Convene meetings with community representatives to share information, elicit feedback, and engage the wider college community regarding the Achieving the Dream initiative and the ongoing status of Seattle Centrals intervention strategies. | X | X | X | X | President, Director of Communications, Director of Multicultural Initiatives , Core team |
| 2. Determine effective communication pathways and information presentation formats for communicating Achieving the Dream information including data reports. | X | X | X | X | Director of Communications, Core team |
| 3. Inform and engage the wider community regarding Achieving the Dream. | X | X | X | X | Director of Communications, Outreach and Recruitment Coordinator |
| 4. Conduct student focus groups to both evaluate current offerings and inform the future design of academic programs and services. | X | X | X | Institutional Research, LSN Director | |
| 5. Make quarterly updates to the Seattle Centrals Achieving the Dream website to reflect the current status and calendar of the Achieving the Dream initiative along with changes in Achieving the Dream participants. | X | X | X | X | LSN Director |


